The letter that arrives after a dermatology appointment is written for another clinician, with you copied in. Its sections follow a predictable order, its vocabulary is descriptive rather than dramatic, and the parts worth acting on are usually the plan and anything asked of you.
This page describes how dermatology correspondence generally works in the United Kingdom. Arrangements differ from one country to another.
Some weeks after the appointment, an envelope arrives. Inside is a letter that appears to be addressed to somebody else, written in vocabulary nobody has explained, describing you in the third person.
This is normal, and it is worth knowing what the document is before trying to read it. It is not a report written for you. It is professional correspondence that you have been copied into, which is an improvement on the older arrangement where you were not.
Why is it written like that?
The long-standing convention is that a specialist writes to the clinician who referred you, and sends you a copy. That is why it opens by thanking somebody for the referral and closes with arrangements between clinicians.
Some services now write directly to the patient, in plainer language, copying the referring clinician instead. Practice varies, and which version you receive says nothing about your case.
Either way the letter has a second life: it goes into your record, and it is what the next clinician reads. That is why factual accuracy in it matters more than its readability.
What are its sections?
Most follow the same order, and recognising the shape makes the letter far less opaque.
It opens with the reason for the appointment, usually a restatement of the referral. Then the history, which is the account you gave, compressed and rendered in clinical terms.
The examination findings come next, and this is the densest part. It describes what was observed using the vocabulary of pattern, distribution, surface and border. It reads strangely because it is deliberately neutral: it records what was seen without interpreting it.
An impression or diagnosis section follows, and it may be hedged. Words like consistent with, suggestive of, or probable are doing real work there, and they mean what they say about certainty.
Then the plan: what has been arranged, what has been prescribed, what will happen next, and whether you are being seen again. Anything asked of you sits here.
Which words are worth pausing on?
The ones that sound worse than they are, mostly. Lesion means a defined area of altered skin and carries no implication about seriousness whatsoever, which is precisely why clinicians reach for it when they want to record something without prejudging it. Erythema means redness. A naevus is a mole, and seeing it written down is unnerving only until somebody tells you so.
Hedging words are the opposite case: they sound mild and carry information. Consistent with is weaker than diagnosed as. Cannot exclude means exactly that, and usually explains why a test was arranged.
Words describing what happens next are the ones to act on. Review, follow-up, discharge, and referred on all have consequences, and discharge in particular means the specialist episode has ended, which people frequently miss.
If a term is unfamiliar, look up its definition rather than its outlook. A glossary answers the question you actually have.
What should you actually do with it?
Read the plan first, before the findings. It is the part with consequences and it is usually near the end, which is where attention has run out.
Check the facts that only you can check: dates, which side of the body, medicines listed, what was recorded as already tried. Errors here are worth reporting to the clinic, because the letter becomes the record.
Then check that what the plan describes has actually been arranged. A letter saying you will be seen again is not the same as an appointment existing, and the space between those two is a common place to get lost. If nothing has arrived by the time the letter implied, contact the service and quote it.
Keep it. Dermatology often unfolds across long intervals, and the letter is a more reliable account of what was said than anybody’s memory of the room. Bringing the previous letter to the next appointment is a small thing that repeatedly turns out to be useful.
Common questions
Why does the letter seem to be addressed to somebody else?
Because it usually is. The convention has long been that the specialist writes to the referring clinician and copies the patient in, which is why it reads as a professional exchange. Some services now write to the patient directly, and practice varies between them.
The letter uses words that sound alarming. Should I be worried?
Clinical vocabulary is descriptive rather than emotional, and words that sound severe in ordinary use are often neutral in it. Lesion means an area of altered skin and implies nothing about seriousness. If a word worries you, that is worth asking about rather than researching.
What should I do if the letter contains a factual error?
Report it to the clinic, since the letter goes into your record and errors propagate. Factual mistakes about dates, medicines or which side of the body was affected are the ones only you can spot, and they are worth correcting promptly.
The letter mentions a follow-up that has not been arranged. What now?
Contact the service that wrote it, quoting the letter. A plan described in correspondence has not necessarily been booked, and the gap between the two is one of the more common places people get lost in the system.
Should I look up the terms it uses?
Looking up a definition is useful; looking up a prognosis is generally not. A glossary tells you what a word means, which is what you are missing. Searching for what a condition does to people produces a range of outcomes that may have nothing to do with your case.
Last updated . How this page was written.